12 Comments

  1. Samantha

    I agree. I believe it was written closer to 1522 than 1527. Unless she was still praising him for this position. But given that he asked for an annulment and most of the court ignored the Queen by 1527 makes me think that isn’t the case.

    • Tudors Dynasty

      Thanks for your feedback! It would seem odd for her to still be thanking him so many years later.

  2. Catalina Monti di Oro

    I really can’t tell but the letter is important because it is the only one that Anne wrote to Henry the Eight. As to finding out about Anne Boleyn or any other wife or anything else about the time period. I do not go to any Facebook page or even the other sites on the Internet, Google or Yahoo or Hotmail or any of the other many places to go on the Internet or the computer. I read books. I go to the library and read books.

    • Tudors Dynasty

      No doubt. However, since posting this I’ve had other researchers tell me that it’s possible this letter is a fake. I have some digging to do to find out if it is. I hope not, but you never know.

    • Tudors Dynasty

      I am sadly no expert on the matter, however I am reading a book right now called “Ladies in Waiting: Women who served at the Tudor court”, and there is no mention of warrants in there. That doesn’t necessarily answer your question definitively but I’ll continue looking for you.

  3. Zoë

    Interesting letter! Wasn’t 1519 when Anne’s sister Mary got called home to England? Could this be where a mix-up of dates occurred?
    I could understand a later date of 1526 (rather than 1527) if Henry is calling Anne back to court after her being banished at Hever for her engagement to Henry Percy.
    Otherwise, I would agree with your guess of 1522 for the reasons you stated.

    • Tudors Dynasty

      Thanks for visiting my site and taking the time to comment – glad you enjoyed it, and of course, agreed with me. 😉

  4. Lynn Drummond

    This is very different letter than I had expected. This is soft, and gentle, this is a young lady, this changes perspective. Thank you for doing this post. More please!!!

  5. Helen

    If it is genuine, and for a letter with this sort of content I don’t see why it wouldn’t be, I would guess from the content it belongs to an earlier timeline. 1527 would seem too late for this particular letter. I’d have to agree that your best sources would be books. As a starting point I recommend David Starkey’s Six Wives and Alison Weirs similarly titled book as well as her Mary Boleyn. As it has some useful information on the 1520’s

  6. Interesting letter, though I think the authenticity should be questioned. If it is indeed genuine, one would think that it would have to be dated closer to 1522.

    Unless, of course, this was written post-Percy Debacle, when Anne returned to court. That would place it closer to 1524. (Perhaps Anne returned to court for Christmastide of her banishment, and had a conversation with the king, which piqued his interest and had her restored to her position in Katherine’s house the following year?) We, of course, know that Henry’s pursuit of Anne began sometime after that initial banishment to Hever after the ‘engagement’ to Percy. And the letter does seem to make some…flirty…references for that time, (lips, heart, etc.)

    If this were after her initial appointment to Katherine’s service, would it not have been more meet for Anne’s father to send this letter to Henry, as he was the one that secured the position for her initially? Also, wasn’t the queen responsible for those selected to her service? Wouldn’t Thomas Boleyn have sent the letter of thanks for the original appointment to Katherine? Can’t imagine Henry being read, sent, or reading a letter from a knight’s daughter after an initial appointment that would have been made by Katherine. But perhaps so if Henry himself had secured the position for her again after she was dismissed due to ‘misconduct’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

12 − six =